Affirmative Action and other Group Tradeoff Policies : Identifiability of those adversely affected
نویسندگان
چکیده
When social resources are limited, improving the lot of the underprivileged comes at the expense of others. Thus, policies such as Affirmative Action (AA) – designed to increase the representation of minority people in higher education or employment – implicitly entail tradeoffs between groups. We propose that, while aversion to personor group-tradeoffs of this sort is widespread, the identifiability of those who stand to lose is a moderating factor. In five experiments, we compared support for several hypothetical AA procedures that are equivalent in terms of the overall harm and benefit, but differ with respect to the identifiability of those who stand to lose from its implementation. Results support the claim that the identifiability of those adversely affected reduces support for AA policies and for similar procedures that are unrelated to civil rights issues. Possible determinants of this effect are discussed.
منابع مشابه
Examining the principles in principled conservatism: the role of responsibility stereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions.
Why do educated conservatives oppose affirmative action? Those in the "principled conservatism" camp say opposition is based on principled judgments of fairness about the policies. Others, however, argue that opposition is based on racism. The present article offers an alternative perspective that may reconcile these contradictory points of view. In 2 studies, the authors show 2 major findings:...
متن کاملAffirmative Action in a Two Stage Statistical Discrimination Model
We investigate the effect of affirmative action policies in a statistical discrimination model with two stages. A group of workers face discrimination in both hiring and promotion decisions of the firm, and the regulator is free to intervene in both stages. We show that there are affirmative action policies which can eliminate negative employer beliefs by increasing educational investment in th...
متن کاملDiscrimination and Affirmative Action
The word discrimination is used loosely to encapsulate negative ideas surrounding the practice. In the case of affirmative action admissions policies at the University of Michigan, discrimination is used to justify an unjust practice. Generally, when affirmative action is debated, it is considered from a singular perspective (i.e., it is wrong or it is right). Most ignore that admissions polici...
متن کاملOn Disguises, Tokens, and Affirmative Action Policies
In Brilliant Disguise: An Empirical Analysis of a Social Experiment Banning Affirmative Action, Professor Deirdre Bowen provides a valuable service by undertaking an empirical assessment of the accuracy of some predictions associated with affirmative action bans. Her analysis suggests that minority students attending schools using affirmative action programs feel better about themselves and the...
متن کاملThoughts On Creativity, Diversity and Innovation in Science & Education
Often observing the national debate on the topics of diversity and affirmative action, I have the impression there is a missing part that needs to be at least understood by those who would argue in favor of actions to continue Affirmative Action policies similar to those first enunciated by the Nixon Administration. While there are powerful moral arguments made for these policies, much less oft...
متن کامل